
For no real reason that I can come up with, I found myself thinking this morning about the effectiveness of Facebook Activism.
Is it a credible, useful and above all else, effective way of raising awareness of social and/or political causes?
A few weeks ago, the British media ran reports of various Facebook groups publicising confidential information relating to the Baby P scandal.
Facebook shut down such pages as soon as they were made aware of them, making sure that they were not breaking court orders which stated that the names of those involved could not be revealed.
Of course, given the sheer size of social networking, it wouldn't surprise this writer if further groups developed under the authorities' radar.
Debating my own question, I'm sceptical as to the impact of such campaigns.
One of the groups in the aforementioned scandal ran under the title of 'Torture the Bitch who Killed Baby P'. Whilst it's probably admirable that such people find themselves emotionally involved in such issues, a title like this lends less credibility to the cause than perhaps a more subtle campaign would.
And, for me at least, credibility should always play a deciding factor in the success of any campaign, socio-political or otherwise.
I specifically remember a group that did the rounds late last year campaigning for the killers of toddler Jamie Bulger to be sent back to prison.
The title of this group, if memory serves correct, was 'Send Jon Venables and Robert Thompson Back to Prison or Execute Them'. Again, this was another very emotionally loaded call-to-arms, but that wasn't the only thing wrong with this group.
Ignoring the fact that this campaign came about years after the crime itself, and even several years after the two were released, this was a group riddled with inaccuracies, from details of the methods of punishment Venables and Thompson used, to the location (many reported the crime taking place in Liverpool, NY, rather than Liverpool, England) to eyewitness descriptions.
Now, if you can't be bothered to get your facts straight, why should anybody bother to join in your campaign?
Interestingly, a Facebook group opposing the site's Jamie Bulger campaigns exists too. You can see this at: http://es.facebook.com/group.php?gid=20937942616&ref=share
There's more to consider here. What happens once people sign up to your group? How do you encourage them to bring about socio-political justice?
I think I may need to indulge in much more research on this one. I'll post more in the near future.
Is it a credible, useful and above all else, effective way of raising awareness of social and/or political causes?
A few weeks ago, the British media ran reports of various Facebook groups publicising confidential information relating to the Baby P scandal.
Facebook shut down such pages as soon as they were made aware of them, making sure that they were not breaking court orders which stated that the names of those involved could not be revealed.
Of course, given the sheer size of social networking, it wouldn't surprise this writer if further groups developed under the authorities' radar.
Debating my own question, I'm sceptical as to the impact of such campaigns.
One of the groups in the aforementioned scandal ran under the title of 'Torture the Bitch who Killed Baby P'. Whilst it's probably admirable that such people find themselves emotionally involved in such issues, a title like this lends less credibility to the cause than perhaps a more subtle campaign would.
And, for me at least, credibility should always play a deciding factor in the success of any campaign, socio-political or otherwise.
I specifically remember a group that did the rounds late last year campaigning for the killers of toddler Jamie Bulger to be sent back to prison.
The title of this group, if memory serves correct, was 'Send Jon Venables and Robert Thompson Back to Prison or Execute Them'. Again, this was another very emotionally loaded call-to-arms, but that wasn't the only thing wrong with this group.
Ignoring the fact that this campaign came about years after the crime itself, and even several years after the two were released, this was a group riddled with inaccuracies, from details of the methods of punishment Venables and Thompson used, to the location (many reported the crime taking place in Liverpool, NY, rather than Liverpool, England) to eyewitness descriptions.
Now, if you can't be bothered to get your facts straight, why should anybody bother to join in your campaign?
Interestingly, a Facebook group opposing the site's Jamie Bulger campaigns exists too. You can see this at: http://es.facebook.com/group.php?gid=20937942616&ref=share
There's more to consider here. What happens once people sign up to your group? How do you encourage them to bring about socio-political justice?
I think I may need to indulge in much more research on this one. I'll post more in the near future.

